← OSINT Library

ACCEPTABILITY OF USSOCOM EMPLOYMENT OF PRIVATE FORCE IN STRATEGIC COMPETITION

NPS Calhoun · Maxwell H. Flanagan and Brock E. Armstrong ·

Executive Summary

This thesis examines the acceptability of USSOCOM employing private forces in strategic competition to address recruiting shortfalls, operational demand, and risk aversion. It concludes that USSOCOM can leverage private forces if they are exclusively former U.S. Special Operations Forces personnel and limited to Security Force Assistance and Foreign Internal Defense missions. This approach offers a scalable, cost-effective, and deniable means of campaigning below the threshold of armed conflict.

Why It Matters

This document provides a framework for how USSOCOM can ethically and effectively utilize private military forces to achieve strategic objectives in an increasingly complex global environment, offering insights into managing risk and operational demands.

Key Takeaways

  • Private forces can mitigate risk for operational commanders and political leaders by not requiring public reporting of casualties, enabling greater freedom of action.
    Source evidence · PDF page 16
    Private forces offer a way to lower risk to force considerations for operational commanders and mitigate political risk because casualties do not necessitate public reporting, allowing for greater freedom of action in ambiguous environments.
  • USSOCOM should exclusively contract former U.S. Special Operations Forces personnel to ensure quality control, training consistency, and alignment with U.S. interests.
    Source evidence · PDF page 17
    Contracts must be exclusively limited to former U.S. Special Operations Forces personnel to guarantee quality control, training consistency, and alignment with U.S. interests.
  • Private forces must be strictly limited to Security Force Assistance (SFA) and Foreign Internal Defense (FID) missions, with an absolute prohibition on offensive combat operations.
    Source evidence · PDF page 17
    Missions must be strictly limited to Security Force Assistance (SFA) and Foreign Internal Defense (FID), with an absolute prohibition on offensive combat operations.

Strategic Relevance

The thesis offers a strategic solution for USSOCOM to address manning shortfalls and increased operational demands in strategic competition by leveraging private forces under strict conditions. It highlights the importance of maintaining control and aligning motivations to avoid the pitfalls seen in historical cases like Executive Outcomes and the Wagner Group, thereby enhancing U.S. influence and capabilities below the threshold of armed conflict.

Source Website View PDF

Key Entities

USSOCOMExecutive OutcomesWagner GroupMilitary Professional ResourcesInc. (MPRI)United States Special Operations Forces (USSOF)AngolaCroatiaAfrica

Best For

Special Operations AnalystsPolicy MakersDefense StrategistsMilitary Commanders

Related Themes

Strategic CompetitionPrivate Military CompaniesSpecial OperationsRisk ManagementForeign Internal DefenseSecurity Force Assistance

Connect these sources with the strategic picture.

Get free DefenseHub articles on geopolitics and defense. Full Source Files editions and the Brief’s Assessment and CALL are for paid members.

Explore DefenseHub Subscribe free