Executive Summary
This paper uses bibliometric methods to analyze research trends in national security economics, comparing Chinese and international literature. Key findings show research themes focus on national security, US-China relations, great power competition, and economic growth. Under great power competition, topics like international trade, industrial policy, and technological competition have become research frontiers. The study highlights differences between Chinese and international scholarship and identifies potential causal links between research themes for future exploration.
Why It Matters
This document provides a meta-analysis of research trends in national security economics, offering insights into the evolving academic and policy focus on the intersection of economic and security issues, particularly in the context of major power competition. It helps defense and geopolitical analysts understand the intellectual landscape shaping strategic thought and policy.
Key Takeaways
- Research in national security economics is increasingly focused on great power competition, international trade, industrial policy, and technological competition.
- There are distinct differences in research characteristics between China and the rest of the world, influenced by Sino-U.S. strategic interactions.
- Bibliometric analysis reveals hidden causal paths and evolving research frontiers, providing a framework for understanding the field's internal logic.
- The study highlights the growing importance of economic statecraft in national security strategies.
Strategic Relevance
Understanding the research landscape of national security economics is crucial for identifying emerging threats, strategic priorities, and potential areas of conflict or cooperation. This analysis helps policymakers and strategists anticipate future challenges and formulate more effective national security and economic policies, especially concerning great power competition and economic interdependence.