Executive Summary
This SIPRI report analyzes the concept of 'Infrastructure for Peace' (I4P) in Syria and Lebanon, examining the actors, regulations, and mechanisms needed for sustainable peacebuilding. It argues for a shift from ad hoc, fragmented efforts to an institutionalized, networked approach that connects local initiatives with national governance. The paper uses Homs (Syria) and Akkar (Lebanon) as case studies to provide policy recommendations for governments, civil society, and international donors to build a coherent peace architecture in both countries.
Why It Matters
This document is crucial for defense and geopolitical analysts as it provides a detailed framework for understanding and implementing sustainable peacebuilding strategies in conflict-affected regions like Syria and Lebanon, directly impacting regional stability and security.
Key Takeaways
- Peacebuilding efforts in Syria and Lebanon are fragmented, relying heavily on under-resourced subnational actors due to weak formal state institutions.
- An effective Infrastructure for Peace (I4P) requires transitioning from reactive crisis management to institutionalized, networked architectures that connect local and national levels.
- Recommendations for both countries focus on strengthening local capacities, integrating peacebuilding into governance, and ensuring inclusivity to achieve durable peace.
Strategic Relevance
The paper offers a strategic blueprint for transitioning from ad hoc conflict management to institutionalized peacebuilding in post-conflict or fragile states. It underscores the importance of a networked approach, integrating local and national efforts, which is vital for long-term stability and preventing conflict recurrence, thereby reducing the need for external military interventions.