← OSINT Library

Who owns war? the state and the role of non-state (armed) actors in modern warfare

OpenAlex · Monica den Boer, Jan Willem Honig, Marten Zwanenburg & Joep Aarts (Editors) ·

Executive Summary

This book explores the evolving role of non-state actors in modern warfare, examining how states increasingly rely on civilian participation and private military companies to augment their defense capabilities. It analyzes the legal and strategic implications of this trend, particularly concerning international humanitarian law and the blurring lines between civilian and military roles.

Why It Matters

This document is crucial for defense analysts as it examines the fundamental shift in modern warfare dynamics, where non-state actors and civilian involvement increasingly shape conflict outcomes and challenge traditional state-centric security paradigms.

Key Takeaways

  • Western militaries are exploring increased societal engagement and civilian participation, such as the Resistance Operating Concept, to strengthen national defense capabilities due to smaller professional forces.
    Source evidence · PDF page 23
    With most Western countries only possessing small active professional forces, it is not surprising that their militaries are considering ways of strengthening national defence capabilities by demanding increased societal engagement.
  • The use of civilian agency in combat and related tasks can heighten risks for civilians, blurring the distinction between combatants and non-combatants under International Humanitarian Law.
    Source evidence · PDF page 68
    One cannot escape the conclusion that capitalising on civilian agency for com- bat and related tasks may indeed exacerbate the risks to civilians, those who do and those who do not directly participate in hostilities.
  • The international security landscape has transformed, with state-sponsored private proxy forces becoming more prevalent in achieving strategic objectives, challenging traditional state control over warfare.
    Source evidence · PDF page 210
    After all, over the past fifteen years, the international security landscape has significantly transformed, with state-sponsored private proxy forces increasingly being utilised to achieve strategic objectives of states.

Strategic Relevance

The document highlights the strategic implications of diversifying actors in warfare, impacting national defense planning, international law, and the nature of future conflicts.

Source Website View PDF

Key Entities

Non-State ActorsPrivate Military Security Companies (PMSCs)International Humanitarian Law (IHL)UkraineWestern CountriesNetherlands Defence AcademyLeiden University PressAnsar AllahSri LankaAfrican National Congress (ANC)SWAPO

Best For

Policy MakersMilitary StrategistsInternational Law ExpertsDefense Academics

Related Themes

Hybrid WarfareAsymmetric WarfareInternational Humanitarian LawCivil-Military RelationsNational Defense

Get the week's most relevant defense documents

Subscribe to our free newsletter to receive curated OSINT reports, analysis, and strategic updates directly in your inbox.

Join the briefing Subscribe