Executive Summary
This dissertation analyzes the Libyan civil war as a proxy stage, examining the efficiency of international organizations' conflict resolution strategies amidst intra-organizational incoherence. It explores the dynamics of external actors' involvement, including military interventions and support for various factions, and their impact on the conflict's persistence.
Why It Matters
The study highlights how external interventions and proxy warfare complicate conflict resolution, demonstrating the challenges international organizations face in achieving peace amidst member state incoherence and competing geopolitical interests.
Key Takeaways
- The Libyan civil war serves as a prime example of modern proxy warfare, where external actors leverage local factions to pursue their own strategic interests.
Source evidence · PDF page 59
However, the invention and subsequent proliferation of the atomic bomb has somewhat ironically forced the application of a less direct type of
- International organizations' efforts to resolve the conflict in Libya have been largely ineffective due to internal incoherence among member states and conflicting national agendas.
Source evidence · PDF page 102
Indeed, the Libya civil war is not only a conflict that throughout the years became increasingly more relevant for non-domestic actors, but it also became a new stage of international confrontation.
- The proliferation of nuclear weapons has ironically pushed major powers towards less direct forms of conflict, such as proxy wars, to avoid direct confrontation.
Source evidence · PDF page 130
It was elaborated on how these IOs’ member states’ incoherent set of actions in conflict resolution mechanisms have led to the failure of these aforementioned agendas
Strategic Relevance
This analysis is crucial for understanding the complexities of modern conflicts, particularly how external state and non-state actors, driven by geopolitical and economic interests, exacerbate internal strife and undermine international peace efforts. It underscores the need for greater coherence and unified strategies among international bodies to effectively address such crises.