← OSINT Library

Assessing Chinese and U.S. Technology Diffusion Capacity

RAND · Francesca Ghiretti, Naoko Aoki, Fiona Quimbre, Jon Schmid, Anton Shenk, Nathaniel Edenfield, Conlan Ellis ·

Executive Summary

This report assesses the technological diffusion capacity of the United States and China, a critical factor in their strategic rivalry. It finds that while both countries have substantial capacity, the U.S. holds an overall edge in production diffusion, whereas China excels in state-coordinated adoption and research-to-research collaboration. The study emphasizes that long-term national advantage hinges on effective technology diffusion, not just innovation.

Why It Matters

This document is crucial for defense and geopolitical analysts as it evaluates the technological diffusion capacities of the U.S. and China, directly impacting their strategic competition and future distribution of global power.

Key Takeaways

  • The United States maintains an overall advantage in technological diffusion capacity, particularly in institutional conditions supporting production diffusion like research-enterprise linkages and absorptive capacity.
    Source evidence · PDF page 59
    The United States retains an overall edge. It performs more strongly in the institutional conditions that support production diffusion, especially in research–enterprise linkages, absorptive capacity, intermediary organizations, and legal-commercial frameworks.
  • China demonstrates a clear advantage in state policy coordination for technology adoption and research-to-research collaboration, enabling rapid scaling of adoption in strategically prioritized sectors.
    Source evidence · PDF page 59
    China’s clearest advantage lies in research-to-research collaboration and state policy coordination, and it has a system that is better set up to quickly scale adoption.
  • Effective technology diffusion, rather than isolated innovation, is paramount for long-term national advantage, as countries that fail to embed general-purpose technologies widely will underperform their potential.
    Source evidence · PDF page 59
    This matters because we argue that long-term national advantage depends less on isolated excellence and more on whether general-purpose technologies become truly embedded across the ordinary fabric of economic life. A country that leads in invention but fails in diffusion will underperform its potential; a country that mobilizes fast but cannot ensure effective use will face diminishing returns.

Strategic Relevance

Understanding the technological diffusion capacities of the U.S. and China is vital for assessing their long-term strategic competition, economic power, and military modernization, particularly in areas like AI and other general-purpose technologies.

Source Website View PDF

Key Entities

United StatesChinaRAND CorporationPeople's Liberation ArmyArtificial IntelligenceTechnology DiffusionStrategic CompetitionEconomic CompetitionRAND China Research CenterMichael Tang

Best For

Policy MakersDefense StrategistsEconomic AnalystsTechnology Policy ResearchersGeopolitical Analysts

Related Themes

Technological CompetitionUS-China RelationsEconomic WarfareStrategic RivalryInnovation PolicyArtificial Intelligence

Get the week's most relevant defense documents

Subscribe to our free newsletter to receive curated OSINT reports, analysis, and strategic updates directly in your inbox.

Join the briefing Subscribe