Executive Summary
This research examines the "policy jolts" in U.S. conventional arms transfers during the Post-Cold War era, analyzing how the international political environment shifts in the late 1980s forced a reevaluation of national defense budgets. It explores how U.S. governmental and economic stakeholders interpreted the utility of arms transfers to manage the defense industrial base's response to reduced defense spending. The study focuses on the behaviors of these stakeholders in shaping U.S. arms sales in the global market.
Why It Matters
This document is crucial for defense analysts as it details the strategic shifts in U.S. arms transfer policy post-Cold War, highlighting the interplay between national security, economic interests, and the defense industrial base.
Key Takeaways
- The end of the Cold War triggered significant policy shifts ("jolts") in U.S. arms transfer strategy, moving from primarily political to economic drivers.
- Despite a global decline in arms sales post-Cold War, the U.S. became the leading exporter due to proactive policies and favorable market conditions.
- U.S. governmental and economic stakeholders actively sought to maintain U.S. dominance in the global arms market to support the domestic defense industry.
Strategic Relevance
The research provides insight into the strategic rationale behind U.S. arms exports, demonstrating how policy adjustments were made to sustain the defense industrial base and project influence in a changing global security landscape.