Executive Summary
The humanitarian funding gap in Chad, exacerbated by the Sudan conflict and withdrawal of major donors like USAID, severely impacts vulnerable populations, particularly refugee women and girls. This shortfall compromises the transition to long-term resilience, weakens protection mechanisms, and undermines the safety and dignity of those displaced. Urgent, sustained, and flexible funding is needed to address critical needs and support local capacity.
Why It Matters
This document highlights how humanitarian funding shortfalls in conflict-affected regions like Chad create instability, exacerbate protection crises, and hinder long-term recovery, directly impacting regional security and requiring strategic consideration from defense analysts.
Key Takeaways
- The humanitarian funding gap in Chad is widening due to increased displacement from Sudan and reduced donor contributions, notably USAID's withdrawal.
- Insufficient funding prevents a shift from emergency response to long-term resilience, leaving populations dependent on aid and vulnerable.
- The funding crisis weakens protection mechanisms, particularly for refugee women and girls, increasing risks of gender-based violence and exploitation.
Strategic Relevance
The humanitarian funding crisis in Chad has significant strategic implications, as it can destabilize the region, create conditions for further conflict, and strain international relations. Addressing these gaps is crucial for regional stability and preventing broader security challenges.