← OSINT Library

Defense Requirements Planning in Comparative Organizations: Case Studies of Selected Adversaries and Allied Nations

RAND · MEGAN McKERNAN, STEPHEN M. WORMAN, ANNA PUGLISI, ELIZABETH BUJWID, JACKSON SMITH, MARK STALCZYNSKI, YULIYA SHOKH, ANDREW DOWSE, SACHINI KADAOLUWA, DANIEL MARNS, AUSTIN WYATT, LUCIA RETTER, HARPER FINE, SYDNE J. NEWBERRY, AUDREY F. CISNEROS ·

Executive Summary

This RAND report analyzes defense requirements planning in China, Russia, Australia, and the UK to inform U.S. Department of War modernization efforts. It compares their processes, highlighting how allies and adversaries validate requirements, influence budgets, and integrate innovation. The study aims to identify practices the U.S. can leverage to enhance speed, industrial capacity, and interoperability.

Why It Matters

This document is crucial for defense and geopolitical analysts as it provides a comparative analysis of defense acquisition and requirements processes among major global powers and allies, directly informing U.S. strategic modernization efforts. Understanding these systems is vital for assessing military capabilities, industrial capacity, and potential for interoperability or competition.

Key Takeaways

  • China's defense acquisition leverages its entire innovation ecosystem with consistent funding, integrating developers and warfighters to streamline processes and accelerate development.
  • Russia's system, though centralized, has adapted to the Ukraine war by shortcutting validation and adopting foreign/commercial technologies, emphasizing speed and continuous innovation.
  • Australia and the UK are reforming their systems towards centralized prioritization, rapid acquisition of off-the-shelf capabilities, and enhanced interoperability with allies like the U.S. through forums like I-JROC and AUKUS.

Strategic Relevance

The report directly addresses the strategic imperative for the U.S. to modernize its defense acquisition system by learning from both adversaries and allies. It highlights critical insights into how different nations prioritize and develop military capabilities, which is essential for maintaining a competitive edge, fostering interoperability, and adapting to a rapidly evolving global security landscape.

Source Website

Key Entities

RAND CorporationU.S. Department of WarChinaRussiaAustraliaUnited KingdomPeople's Liberation ArmyCentral Military CommissionJoint Capabilities Integration and Development SystemNational Defense Authorization ActJoint StaffAUKUS

Best For

Policy MakersDefense Acquisition ProfessionalsMilitary StrategistsGeopolitical AnalystsDefense Industry

Related Themes

Defense AcquisitionMilitary ModernizationIndustrial BaseStrategic CompetitionAlliancesInteroperability

Get the week's most relevant defense documents

Subscribe to our free newsletter to receive curated OSINT reports, analysis, and strategic updates directly in your inbox.

Join the briefing Subscribe