← OSINT Library

Organising Military Innovation: Collaborative Opportunities for Organisational and Military Innovation Scholars

OpenAlex · Neil Stott, Jarrod Pendlebury, Paul Tracey ·

Executive Summary

This paper advocates for increased collaboration between military innovation and organizational scholars, introducing the concept of a 'military-innovation complex' to describe the opaque interactions among military, state, academic, and commercial actors. It proposes a framework of innovation work—idea work, organizational work, and inter-organizational work—to bridge existing literature and identify areas for future research. The authors argue that understanding this complex is crucial for democratic oversight and effective innovation management.

Why It Matters

This document is crucial for defense analysts as it dissects the evolving 'military-innovation complex,' highlighting how military, academic, and commercial entities collaboratively drive defense advancements and the implications for strategic competition and democratic oversight. Understanding these dynamics is key to anticipating future military capabilities and geopolitical shifts.

Key Takeaways

  • The 'military-innovation complex' describes the increasingly opaque and symbiotic relationship between military, state, academic, and commercial actors in driving innovation.
  • Military innovation involves three key processes: idea work (generating concepts), organizational work (implementing innovation within military structures), and inter-organizational work (collaboration across entities).
  • Increased scrutiny and collaboration between military and organizational scholars are essential for democratic oversight and effective management of military innovation, especially given its far-reaching societal impacts.
  • The US has transitioned from a 'Developmental Bureaucratic State' (DBS) to a 'Developmental Network State' (DNS) in military innovation, exemplified by agencies like DARPA and DIU.
  • Academic involvement in military innovation has become more diffuse and opaque, raising concerns about the militarization of research and the need for critical discourse.

Strategic Relevance

This paper provides a critical framework for understanding the complex ecosystem driving military innovation, moving beyond the traditional military-industrial complex to include academia and commercial entrepreneurship. This understanding is vital for policymakers and strategists to assess national defense capabilities, manage technological competition, and ensure democratic accountability in defense-related research and development.

Source Website View PDF

Key Entities

DARPARAND CorporationUSAFDIUIn-Q-TelNATOUS ArmyUniversity of CambridgeThe University of MelbourneUnited StatesAustraliaChinaRussia

Best For

Policy MakersDefense StrategistsAcademicsInnovation AnalystsGeopolitical Analysts

Related Themes

Military-Industrial ComplexDefense InnovationStrategic CompetitionCivil-Military RelationsTechnological WarfareNational Security Policy

Connect these sources with the strategic picture.

Get free DefenseHub articles on geopolitics and defense. Full Source Files editions and the Brief’s Assessment and CALL are for paid members.

Explore DefenseHub Subscribe free