← OSINT Library

Alternative assignment incentive pay formats

NPS Calhoun · Pinkston, Antonio; Moreno, Jesus; Mainor, Walter C. ·

Executive Summary

This MBA professional report investigates and analyzes alternative auction formats for the U.S. Navy's Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP) program. It evaluates the efficiency of these formats in determining individual assignments for enlisted personnel, aiming to improve retention and cost-effectiveness. The study compares bidding behavior across different rules for job assignments and reviews the Navy's current billet assignment policies.

Why It Matters

This document is crucial for defense analysts as it explores innovative approaches to military personnel management and retention, directly impacting force readiness and operational capabilities. Understanding incentive pay structures and their efficiency can inform strategic human capital decisions across various defense organizations.

Key Takeaways

  • The U.S. Navy uses Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP) to fill hard-to-fill billets, employing an auction system to determine compensation.
  • The study analyzes experimental data to assess how auction design (bid weight, auction type, contention level) impacts efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
  • Recommendations aim to help the Navy develop theoretical models of bidding behavior and refine metrics for improved assignment planning and retention.
  • The Navy's current job assignment system relies on a centralized, fairly static pay structure, which can lead to retention problems for highly skilled sailors.
  • The AIP program was authorized by Congress to attract sailors to volunteer for hard-to-fill assignments through monthly stipends.
  • The research seeks to determine if changes in the AIP format can improve retention and cost-effectiveness by analyzing auction behavior and refining metrics.

Strategic Relevance

Optimizing military personnel assignment and retention through effective incentive programs is critical for maintaining force readiness, reducing training costs, and ensuring the right talent is in the right place. This research directly contributes to strategic human resource planning within the defense sector.

Source Website View PDF

Key Entities

U.S. NavyAssignment Incentive Pay (AIP)Naval Postgraduate SchoolDepartment of DefenseChief of Naval PersonnelBill GatesPeter CoughlanJohn Mutty

Best For

Military Human ResourcesDefense Policy MakersNaval StrategistsEconomistsAcademics

Related Themes

Military Personnel ManagementDefense EconomicsForce ReadinessHuman Capital StrategyNaval OperationsRetention Strategies

Get the week's most relevant defense documents

Subscribe to our free newsletter to receive curated OSINT reports, analysis, and strategic updates directly in your inbox.

Join the briefing Subscribe